The artifact is a battle axe made from magmatic rock (diabase) of gray-brown color. It was accidentally discovered in 1966 within the territory of Aluniș village, Rîșcani district. Based on its morphological characteristics, the artifact can be attributed to the Catacomb culture (29th-22nd centuries BCE).
The axe features a massive, elongated naviform body with slightly pronounced shoulders, a short and narrow edge that is flat and circular in cross-section. The blade is slightly curved. The hole was drilled in the maximum width of the object. It is circular in shape with a diameter of 2.2 cm. The surface of the artifact is meticulously polished, worked with great care, and shows no signs of damage or chipping.
Dimensions: Length: 20.0 cm; Maximum width: 8.4 cm; Edge diameter: 5.0 cm; Blade width: 7.0 cm; Weight: 2.3 kg.
Stone battle axes are characteristic of the Catacomb culture communities and are most often found as grave goods, deposited in tombs. Their presence in funerary complexes suggests a multifaceted functionality: weapons, social symbols, and ritual objects. Initially used as weapons, the axes became social symbols for their owners, later acquiring votive significance when deposited in tombs to serve the deceased in the afterlife.
The social symbolic function of stone battle axes is indicated by the high-quality rocks used for their manufacture and the exceptionally meticulous craftsmanship. The large dimensions of the axe from Aluniș support this hypothesis and distinguish it from other examples.
The discovery of stone battle axes outside a funerary complex may indicate their votive deposition. It is difficult to imagine that these exceptionally well-crafted pieces, made from high-quality rocks transported over great distances, could have been abandoned or lost accidentally. It is far more likely that they were deposited for magical-religious purposes, a possibility that may also apply to the stone axe discovered at Aluniș.
All scientific articles submitted for publication in the journal "Tyragetia" are reviewed under the peer reviewsystem.
The peer review is an evaluation of scientific work by two referees with equal rights, which check compliance of publication, identify deviations from the standards of the journal and make suggestions for improving the quality of the publication.
Copies of articles received (hard copy or digital version) in the office are transmitted by the chief editor or the editorial secretary to researchers who are considered experts in the field and are part of the Journal’s list of peer reviewers.
Reviewers write (within 30 days) one review of the article received which is handed to the editorial secretary. The latter, transmits all comments made by reviewers to the authors. Upon request, the reviewers may remain anonymous to the author of the reviewed article.
The evaluation of articles aims at verification of the following:
- article corresponds to journal profile;
- compliance with publication rules and structure of the article;
- the results presented are sufficiently innovative and interesting in order to justify publication;
- quality of scientific content;
- respect of ethical principles;
- relevance of bibliographic sources.
Reviewers' assessment should include in the end one of the following recommendations for the article analyzed:
- unconditional acceptance of article;
- acceptance on condition to make the mentioned changes in the review;
- reject the article.
If only one review received negative assessment, the chief editor can request a third review of the article. If the article is considered to need further revision, it is returned to the author with necessary recommendations.
The artifact is a battle axe made from magmatic rock (diabase) of gray-brown color. It was accidentally discovered in 1966 within the territory of Aluniș village, Rîșcani district. Based on its morphological characteristics, the artifact can be attributed to the Catacomb culture (29th-22nd centuries BCE)...
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
The National Museum of History of Moldova takes place among the most significant museum institutions of the Republic of Moldova, in terms of both its collection and scientific reputation.
31 August 1989 St., 121 A, MD 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova
